Reviews, Criticism

[Dirk]

If you happen to catch a review of PS, please feel free to post it here:

I just found this one from a guy who bought Part One at Sugoicon.  Didn't hook him, but oh well.  Guess it's just not his thing. 

Here are some older ones:

Review by SuperReal's Jason Martin

Part Two reviewed at Comic's Waiting Room

Secret Identity Podcast's review

WCN Reviews

Panel 2 Panel's Jason Brown

Robert A. Howard's take

Should It Be a Movie? at the former Moviepoopshoot.com and again for the Part Two mini, which I admit wasn't the best presentation at the time.

On the Comic Geek Speak podcast also, interviewed!

And last, but not least, my original review back in the December '03 issue of NewType USA:

[Dirk]

Also, I got reviewed in the The Comics Journal!  Amazingly, they were actually pretty kind, all things considered:

[starstriker1]

Eh? When did "determinedly likeable" become a point against a character?

[Dirk]

I guess it depends on the type of story you're trying to create.  Some have complicated characters that are interesting, but aren't always likeable. 

Anyway, I just found a new review over at Broken Frontier:

The Daily Read: 11/30
by Richard Pulfer
If you want anime Wolfen goodness, Richard recommends Paradigm Shift.

[Dirk]

Another review at ComixTalk:

POLICE PROCEDURAL WITH A TWIST

[Dirk]

Reviewed by Comic Fencing!

Looks like the folks at Comic Fencing got ahold of PS this week with mixed results (2.5-5 stars, depending on the reviewer).  I have to admit, I do find some of their critique to be pretty accurate.  I'm way more aware of my shortcomings than you might expect, especially in the writing department.  I guess I'm an artist first and writer second.  I just try my best, and hope that it works out in the end.

[Themorgueescapee]

I guess I'm an artist first and writer second

It doesn't show

[Dirk]

BTW, forum critique:

http://forum.superdickery.com/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=205&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&start=1075

Domain name says it all, I guess.

[Themorgueescapee]

"... all but apologizes in his notes for a mildly revealing shower scene"

This caught my eye and when after I gave it some thought I wondered; What kind of criticism is that?